CourtListener 9489452•Ex Parte Cathy Denise Fields v. the State of Texas
Ex Parte Cathy Denise Fields v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 9489452Txctapp14Mar 26, 2024
Full text
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 26, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00131-CR
EX PARTE CATHY DENISE FIELDS
On Appeal from the 149th District Court
Brazoria County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 88107-CR-A
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this appeal, appellant, proceeding pro se, seeks review of the trial court’s
order signed February 5, 2024 denying her application for writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure sets out “the
procedures for an application for writ of habeas corpus in which the applicant
seeks relief from a felony judgment imposing a penalty other than death.” Tex.
Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 § 1. The statute lays out a review mechanism
primarily involving both the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and the court in
which the conviction being challenged was obtained. Id. § 3(a)–(b); see also Maye
v. State, 966 S.W.2d 140, 142 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.).
The statute notes that “[a]fter conviction [its] procedure . . . shall be exclusive and
any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in discharging the
prisoner.” Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 § 5.
This court informed appellant of the jurisdictional problem the statute poses,
and she was granted 21 days to demonstrate this court possesses jurisdiction over
his appeal. Appellant’s response fails to indicate any basis for this court to
exercise jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want
of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.