CourtListener 9476354•Henry Keculah v. Catherine Hayes
Full text
Appeal dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 15, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00881-CV
HENRY KECULAH, Appellant
V.
CATHERINE HAYES, Appellee
On Appeal from the 257th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2023-37863
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from an order signed on November 14, 2023
denying appellant’s request to proceed without paying court costs. Generally,
appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39
S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and
claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is
rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson,
53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266,
272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Orders denying requests to proceed without
paying court costs are normally not appealable interlocutory orders. El-Bey v. Est.
of Williams, Nos. 01-23-00070-CV & 01-23-00073-CV, 2023 WL 4239852, at *1
(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 29, 2023, pet. filed) (per curiam) (mem. op.).
On January 26, 2024, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s
intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless any party demonstrated
this court has jurisdiction over this appeal on or before February 5, 2024. See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.3(a). No response was filed.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.