CourtListener 10101178•Son v. Mai and Hoa T. Nguyen v. Yenhi Le Trang and Houng Trang
Son v. Mai and Hoa T. Nguyen v. Yenhi Le Trang and Houng Trang
CourtListener 10101178Txctapp14Aug 27, 2024
Full text
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 27, 2024
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00529-CV
SON V. MAI AND HOA T. NGUYEN, Appellants
V.
YENHI LE TRANG AND HOUNG TRANG, Appellees
On Appeal from the 333rd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2023-78674
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory order signed June 25,
2024. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v.
Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of
all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable
until final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total
Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc.
v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
On August 1, 2024, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s
intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a
response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal within 10 days. See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.3(a). On August 8, 2024, appellants filed a motion to withdraw the
appeal. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.