CourtListener 10674811•In Re City of McAllen, Texas v. the State of Texas
In Re City of McAllen, Texas v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10674811Txctapp13Sep 15, 2025
Full text
NUMBER 13-25-00442-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE CITY OF MCALLEN, TEXAS
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Silva, Peña, and West
Memorandum Opinion by Justice West 1
Relator City of McAllen, Texas filed a “Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Motion
for Emergency Relief” seeking to compel the trial court to: (1) hold a hearing and rule on
relator’s verified application for a temporary restraining order; (2) alternatively, assign the
case to another judge so that a hearing and ruling could be had; and (3) hold a hearing
1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not
required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R.
47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
on relator’s verified application for temporary injunction within fourteen days. However,
relator has now filed a motion to dismiss its petition for writ of mandamus and motion for
emergency relief on grounds that the trial court held a hearing on relator’s application for
a temporary restraining order, granted the temporary restraining order, and set a hearing
on relator’s application for a temporary injunction. Relator asserts that all issues raised
herein are moot, and relator thus requests that we dismiss this original proceeding.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus
and motion for emergency relief, the motion to dismiss, and the documents on file, is of
the opinion that relator’s motion to dismiss should be granted. See In re Contract
Freighters, Inc., 646 S.W.3d 810, 813 (Tex. 2022) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam);
Heckman v. Williamson County, 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012); In re Kellogg Brown
& Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we grant
the motion to dismiss, and we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for
emergency relief, and all relief sought therein, as moot. Relator’s unopposed motion to
abate this original proceeding is likewise dismissed as moot.
JON WEST
Justice
Delivered and filed on the
15th day of September, 2025.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.