CourtListener 10663594•Todd Alexander and All Other Occupants v. Lost Creek Ranch Apartments
Todd Alexander and All Other Occupants v. Lost Creek Ranch Apartments
CourtListener 10663594Txctapp13Aug 29, 2025
Full text
NUMBER 13-25-00263-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
TODD ALEXANDER AND
ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellants,
V.
LOST CREEK RANCH APARTMENTS, Appellee.
____________________________________________________________
ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5
OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS
____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Fonseca
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Tijerina
The cause is before the Court on its own motion. On May 12, 2025, appellant filed
a notice of appeal. On May 13, 2025, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the
notice of appeal was defective and did not comply with Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure 9.1(b), and 25.1(d)(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), and (8). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1(b),
25.1(d)(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), and (8). On May 23, 2025, we abated the matter and
remanded the cause for the trial court to determine whether appellant was indigent,
among other determinations. Upon review of the trial court’s order dated July 24, 2025,
appellant is not indigent and no longer wants to move forward with the appeal.
On July 25, 2025, we reinstated the appeal, and the Clerk of the Court sent notice
to appellant that he was delinquent in remitting the $205.00 filing fee. Appellant was
further notified that the appeal is subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within
ten days from the date of the notice. See id. R. 42.3. On August 26, 2025, the notice, sent
via the United States Postal Service, was returned to the Court and marked “return to
sender,” “unclaimed,” and “unable to forward.” Furthermore, on August 10, 2025, the
Clerk of the Court notified appellant that his amended notice of appeal was defective and
instructed appellant to cure the defects within ten days of the notice.
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.1(b) requires unrepresented parties to sign
any document filed and “give the party’s mailing address, telephone number, fax number,
if any, and email address.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1(b). Appellant has failed to provide a
correct mailing address and has otherwise failed to respond to the clerk’s notices.
Furthermore, Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3 permits an appellate court, on its
own initiative after giving ten days’ notice to all parties, to dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution or for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules. See id. R.
42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See id.
JAIME TIJERINA
Chief Justice
Delivered and filed on the
29th day of August, 2025.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.