CourtListener 10659176•Anthony L. Sheridan v. John Hoberman, Susan Hoberman, and Almagen, LLC
Anthony L. Sheridan v. John Hoberman, Susan Hoberman, and Almagen, LLC
CourtListener 10659176Txctapp13Aug 21, 2025
Full text
NUMBER 13-25-00188-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
ANTHONY L. SHERIDAN, Appellant,
v.
JOHN HOBERMAN, SUSAN HOBERMAN,
AND ALMAGEN, LLC, Appellees.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT
OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Silva, Peña, and Cron
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña
This matter is before the Court on its own motion. 1 Upon review of the clerk’s
record, on July 24, 2025, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that it appears the order
1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket
equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §73.001.
he is attempting to appeal is not a final, appealable order. Appellant was further notified
that if the defect was not cured within ten days from the date of the notice, the appeal
shall be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Appellant has not responded to the notice.
Accordingly, we now dismiss for want of prosecution.
Having considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to correct the
jurisdictional defect, and appellant’s failure to otherwise respond to the notice from the
Clerk of the Court requiring a response or other action within the time specified, the appeal
is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).
L. ARON PEÑA JR.
Justice
Delivered and filed on the
21st day of August, 2025.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.