CourtListener 10646828•Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
CourtListener 10646828Txctapp13Jul 31, 2025
Full text
NUMBER 13-25-00328-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
STEPHEN PAUL CARRIGAN, Appellant,
v.
COMMISSION FOR
LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 148TH DISTRICT COURT
OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Fonseca
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Fonseca
This matter is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss. Appellant no
longer wishes to pursue this appeal.
The Court, having considered the motion, is of the opinion that the motion should
be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the motion to dismiss is granted,
and the appeal is hereby dismissed. The costs are taxed against the appellant. See id. R.
42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”).
Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained.
YSMAEL D. FONSECA
Justice
Delivered and filed on the
31st day of July, 2025.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.