Christine Yin and Kimsour Sin D/B/A Christine Ocean Seafood & Grill v. Dorothy Ramirez

CourtListener 10619519Txctapp13Jun 26, 2025

Full text

NUMBER 13-25-00162-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

CHRISTINE YIN AND KIMSOUR SIN
D/B/A CHRISTINE OCEAN
SEAFOOD & GRILL, Appellants,

v.

DOROTHY RAMIREZ, Appellee.

ON APPEAL FROM THE 135TH DISTRICT COURT
OF VICTORIA COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Silva, Peña, and Cron
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña

This cause is before the Court on its own motion. On April 7, 2025, appellants filed

a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record was due on May 6, 2025. On May 6, 2025, the Clerk

of the Court notified appellants that the deputy district clerk, Kim Plummer, had notified

the Court that appellants had failed to make arrangements for payment of the
clerk’s record. Appellants were notified that unless they made arraignments to pay for the

clerk’s record and proof of payment was provided to the Court within ten days, the appeal

was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. 37.3(b). Appellants

failed to respond to the requested documentation.

No clerk’s record has been filed due to appellants’ failure to pay or make payment

arrangements, and appellants have failed to comply with a notice from the Clerk of the

Court requiring a response or other action within the time specified; accordingly, the

appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Id. R. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

L. ARON PEÑA JR.
Justice

Delivered and filed on the
26th day of June, 2025.

2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.