CourtListener 10619519•Christine Yin and Kimsour Sin D/B/A Christine Ocean Seafood & Grill v. Dorothy Ramirez
Christine Yin and Kimsour Sin D/B/A Christine Ocean Seafood & Grill v. Dorothy Ramirez
CourtListener 10619519Txctapp13Jun 26, 2025
Full text
NUMBER 13-25-00162-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
CHRISTINE YIN AND KIMSOUR SIN
D/B/A CHRISTINE OCEAN
SEAFOOD & GRILL, Appellants,
v.
DOROTHY RAMIREZ, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 135TH DISTRICT COURT
OF VICTORIA COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Silva, Peña, and Cron
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña
This cause is before the Court on its own motion. On April 7, 2025, appellants filed
a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record was due on May 6, 2025. On May 6, 2025, the Clerk
of the Court notified appellants that the deputy district clerk, Kim Plummer, had notified
the Court that appellants had failed to make arrangements for payment of the
clerk’s record. Appellants were notified that unless they made arraignments to pay for the
clerk’s record and proof of payment was provided to the Court within ten days, the appeal
was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. 37.3(b). Appellants
failed to respond to the requested documentation.
No clerk’s record has been filed due to appellants’ failure to pay or make payment
arrangements, and appellants have failed to comply with a notice from the Clerk of the
Court requiring a response or other action within the time specified; accordingly, the
appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Id. R. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).
L. ARON PEÑA JR.
Justice
Delivered and filed on the
26th day of June, 2025.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.