CourtListener 9501327•Devin Tremaine v. Maddison Lery Reid and in the Interest of L. L. T., a Child
Devin Tremaine v. Maddison Lery Reid and in the Interest of L. L. T., a Child
CourtListener 9501327Txctapp12May 8, 2024
Full text
NO. 12-24-00022-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
DEVIN TREMAINE, § APPEAL FROM THE 1ST
APPELLANT
V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
MADDISON LERY REID AND IN THE
INTEREST OF L. L. T., A CHILD, § SABINE COUNTY, TEXAS
APPELLEE
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
The trial court entered an order of dismissal on January 12, 2024, making a timely notice
of appeal due on or before February 12. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. Devin Tremaine, acting pro
se, filed a docketing statement, but no notice of appeal, with the Sabine County District Clerk on
February 5. A party who seeks to alter the trial court’s judgment or other appealable order must
file a notice of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(c). An appeal is perfected when a written notice of
appeal is filed with the trial court clerk. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(a). But “a timely filed instrument
will invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction if it demonstrates a bona fide attempt to do so[.]”
State ex rel. Durden v. Shahan, 658 S.W.3d 300, 304 (Tex. 2022) (per curiam). When a party
timely makes a “bona fide attempt to invoke appellate jurisdiction, the court of appeals must
accept the deficient notice or give the party an opportunity to amend and refile it to perfect the
appeal.” Id. at 305.
Accordingly, on April 3, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the record does
not show this Court’s jurisdiction, namely, there was no notice of appeal filed within the time
proscribed by appellate Rule 26.1 and no timely motion for extension of time to file same as
permitted by Rule 26.3. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1. We further notified Appellant that the appeal
would be dismissed unless the information was amended on or before April 15 to show the
jurisdiction of the Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3; see also Shahan, 658 S.W.3d at 304 (“courts
must grant parties a reasonable opportunity to correct a procedural defect before they dismiss an
appeal on that ground”); Grand Prairie Indep. School Dist. v. Southern Parts Imports,
Inc., 813 S.W.2d 499, 500 (Tex. 1991) (per curiam) (“If the appellant timely files a document in
a bona fide attempt to invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction, the court of appeals, on
appellant’s motion, must allow the appellant an opportunity to amend or refile the instrument
required by law or our Rules to perfect the appeal”). This deadline passed and Appellant has not
filed a notice of appeal showing this Court’s jurisdiction or otherwise responded to this Court’s
notice. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
Opinion delivered May 8, 2024.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
2
COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
MAY 8, 2024
NO. 12-24-00022-CV
DEVIN TREMAINE,
Appellant
V.
MADDISON LERY REID AND IN THE INTEREST OF L. L. T., A CHILD,
Appellee
Appeal from the 1st District Court
of Sabine County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV2314227)
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same
being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that it is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and
that the appeal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that
this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision
be certified to the court below for observance.
By per curiam opinion.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.