CourtListener 10191860•Custom Coils, Inc. v. Leta Nash, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Danny Nash
Custom Coils, Inc. v. Leta Nash, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Danny Nash
CourtListener 10191860Txctapp12Oct 31, 2024
Full text
NO. 12-24-00297-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
CUSTOM COILS, INC., ET AL, § APPEAL FROM THE 369TH
APPELLANTS
§ DISTRICT COURT
V.
§ CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS
LETA NASH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF
THE ESTATE OF DANNY NASH,
APPELLEE
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate
rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a
specified time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay--
at the time an item is presented for filing--whatever fees are required by statute or Texas
Supreme Court order. TEX. R. APP. P. 5; see TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. An appellate court may
enforce Rule 5 by any order that is just. TEX. R. APP. P. 5. After giving ten days’ notice, an
appellate court may dismiss an appeal because the appellant failed to comply with a requirement
of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other
action within a specified time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
On October 9, 2024, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellants, Custom Coils, Inc., U.S.
Holdings Corporation, and James C. Holcomb, that the filing fee in this appeal is due and that the
appeal would be subject to dismissal if the fee was not paid on or before October 21. The date for
remitting the filing fee passed, and Appellants have not paid the fee or otherwise shown that they
are excused from paying the fee.1
Because Appellants failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).2
Opinion delivered October 31, 2024.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
1
The case information sheet from the Cherokee County District Clerk’s Office reflects that Appellants
were not declared indigent in the trial court.
2
We also note that Appellants have not filed the required docketing statement or corrected defects in the
filing of their notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1 (docketing statement); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.
CODE ANN. § 51.017(a) (West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must be served on each court reporter responsible for
preparing reporter’s record).
COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
OCTOBER 31, 2024
NO. 12-24-00297-CV
CUSTOM COILS, INC., ET AL,
Appellants
V.
LETA NASH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
ESTATE OF DANNY NASH,
Appellee
Appeal from the 369th District Court
of Cherokee County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2019100487)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered,
it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the appeal be,
and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for
observance.
By per curiam opinion.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.