CourtListener 10812864•Brayden Scott Roupp v. the State of Texas
Full text
Opinion filed March 19, 2026
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals
___________
No. 11-25-00285-CR
___________
BRAYDEN SCOTT ROUPP, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 70th District Court
Ector County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. A241142CR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted Appellant, Brayden Scott Roupp, of the first-degree felony
offense of murder and assessed his punishment at life imprisonment in the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02(b), (c) (West
Supp 2025). The trial court sentenced him accordingly. Appellant filed a notice of
appeal from the trial court’s judgment.
Appellant has now filed a motion to “[w]ithdraw” his appeal. In the motion,
Appellant states that he “does not desire to appeal the verdict of guilt or the
sentencing by the jury.” He states that his attorney “has advised [him] that once he
withdraws his right to appeal, he will no longer have the opportunity to do so[,] and
in full understanding, [Appellant] does desire to [w]ithdraw his [a]ppeal.”
We construe Appellant’s motion as a request to dismiss his appeal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.2(a). The motion is signed by Appellant and Appellant’s attorney in
compliance with Rule 42.2(a). Id.
We grant Appellant’s motion and dismiss this appeal.
W. STACY TROTTER
JUSTICE
March 19, 2026
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.