Polito Trevino III v. the State of Texas

Opinion filed September 19, 2024

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals
___________

No. 11-24-00204-CR
___________

POLITO TREVINO III, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 142nd District Court
Midland County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CR57538

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Polito Trevino III, pled guilty to the third-degree felony offense of
driving while intoxicated. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.09(b)(2) (West Supp.
2023). He pled “true” to the habitual offender enhancement allegations, which
subjected him to a punishment range of imprisonment for no less than twenty-five
years but not more than ninety-nine years, or life. See PENAL § 12.42(d) (West
2019). On August 4, 2022, pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement between
Appellant and the State, the trial court sentenced Appellant to imprisonment for
twenty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice.
On July 25, 2024, Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal from the trial
court’s judgment of conviction. Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, we notified
Appellant by letter that his pro se notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and
requested a response showing grounds to continue the appeal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 26.2(a). We have not received a response.
A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to vest the court of appeals with
jurisdiction. Id.; Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012);
Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522–23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). To be timely, the
notice of appeal must be filed: (1) within thirty days after the date sentence is
imposed in open court; or (2) if the defendant timely filed a motion for new trial,
within ninety days after sentencing. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). Appellant did not file
a motion for new trial, and he filed his pro se notice of appeal 721 days after his
sentence was imposed in open court. The notice of appeal was therefore untimely,
and we are without jurisdiction to consider a motion for an out-of-time appeal from
a final felony conviction. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243
(Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (The Court of Criminal Appeals is “the only court with
jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings.”); Portley v. State, 89
S.W.3d 188, 189 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002, no pet.) (The proper vehicle for
seeking an out-of-time appeal is an application for writ of habeas corpus filed with
the Court of Criminal Appeals under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure.). Consequently, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over Appellant’s appeal,
and must dismiss it. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998);

2
Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522–23; Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 110 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1993).
Furthermore, the documents on file with this court show that Appellant
entered into a negotiated plea agreement, the trial court assessed his punishment in
accordance with the parties’ plea agreement, and Appellant waived his right to
appeal. The trial court’s certification, which was signed by the trial court, Appellant,
and Appellant’s trial counsel, further certifies that Appellant has no right of appeal.
The plea documents and stipulations signed and acknowledged by Appellant support
the trial court’s certification, and nothing demonstrates that the trial court otherwise
granted Appellant permission to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613–
14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). A defendant who enters into a plea agreement may
appeal only: (1) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on
by the trial court before trial; (2) after receiving the trial court’s permission to appeal;
or (3) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute. TEX. R.
APP. P. 25.2(a)(2); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2018). A
plea-bargaining defendant may not appeal matters related to the voluntariness of his
plea unless he has obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. See Cooper v.
State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 83 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Carender v. State, 155 S.W.3d 929,
931 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.).
Thus, even if Appellant had timely perfected an appeal, his appeal would have
been prohibited by Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
An appellate court must dismiss an appeal without further action when there is
no certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal. TEX. R.
APP. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); see
Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 613–14.

3
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

W. STACY TROTTER
JUSTICE
September 19, 2024
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

4