CourtListener 10794674•Stacie Ann Shakir v. Providence at Memorial Apartments LLC
Stacie Ann Shakir v. Providence at Memorial Apartments LLC
CourtListener 10794674Txctapp1Feb 10, 2026
Full text
Opinion issued February 10, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-25-00295-CV
———————————
STACIE ANN SHAKIR, Appellant
V.
PROVIDENCE AT MEMORIAL APARTMENTS LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 1230917
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 12, 2025, the Court struck appellant’s brief because it failed to
comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1 and outlined specific
deficiencies for correction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. On September 29, 2025,
appellant filed an amended brief. Although appellant corrected some deficiencies
noted in the court’s August 12, 2025 order, the brief did not correct other deficiencies
specified in our order. Thus, the Court struck the amended brief and issued another
order on October 2, 2025, listing the deficiencies in the amended brief and ordered
appellant to file a brief correcting the listed deficiencies by October 17, 2025. The
Court stated in the October 2, 2025 order that if appellant failed to file a second
amended brief correcting the listed deficiencies, the Court might dismiss the appeal
without further notice.
On October 6, 2025, appellant filed a motion to accept the brief that had been
stricken and a motion for summary judgment in favor of appellant. We deny the
motions.
Because appellant has not complied with our order of October 2, 2025, the
Court dismisses the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3, 43.2(f). Any other pending
motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Dokupil.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.