CourtListener 9434444•ROGERS, WILLIAM v. the State of Texas
Full text
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. PD-0242-19
WILLIAM ROGERS, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
REFUGIO COUNTY
Per curiam. RICHARDSON, J., filed a concurring opinion in which HERVEY,
WALKER, and SLAUGHTER, JJ., joined. KELLER, P.J., and KEEL, J., dissented.
OPINION
Appellant was convicted by a jury of burglary of a habitation.1 On direct appeal,
appellant challenged the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on certain defensive
issues. The court of appeals held that error in the jury charge, if any, was harmless.
Rogers v. State, 527 S.W.3d 329, 335 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi 2017). We granted
1
Appellant was also convicted of aggravated assault, but that conviction was vacated by the
court of appeals. Rogers v. State, 527 S.W.3d 329, 336 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi 2018).
ROGERS PD-0242-19 – 2
appellant’s petition for discretionary review and reversed, holding that if error existed, it
was harmful. Rogers v. State, 550 S.W.3d 190, 196 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018). Accordingly,
we remanded to the court of appeals to decide, in the first instance, whether the trial court
erred in failing to instruct on the defensive issues. Id.
On remand, the court of appeals held that the trial court had not erred in failing to
instruct on the requested defensive issues. Rogers v. State, No. 13-15-00600-CR (Tex.
App.–Corpus Christi Jan. 10, 2019)(not designated for publication). Appellant again filed
a petition for discretionary review which this Court granted. On October 26, 2022, we
issued an opinion reversing the court of appeals and holding that appellant was entitled to
jury instructions on the defensive issues. Rogers v. State, No. PD-0242-19 (Tex. Crim.
App. Oct. 26, 2022).
The State has now filed a “Motion to Withdraw Appellate Opinions and
Permanently Abate the Appeal” as a result of appellant’s death which occurred in March
of 2022. A copy of the death certificate is attached to the State’s motion.
We grant the State’s motion, dismiss Appellant’s petition for discretionary review,
withdraw our 2018 and 2022 opinions, and order the court of appeals to withdraw its
2017 and 2019 opinions and permanently abate the appeal. See Brown v. State, 439
S.W.3d 929 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)(where defendant died while rehearing motion
pending, Court dismissed petition and rehearing motion, withdrew its opinion, and
ordered court of appeals to withdraw opinion and permanently abate appeal).
ROGERS PD-0242-19 – 3
Delivered October 18, 2023
Publish
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.