Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0502

October 30, 2025

Ms. Gloria Meraz
Director and Librarian
Texas State Library and Archives Commission
Post Office Box 12927
Austin, Texas 78711-2927

Opinion No. KP-0502

Re: Whether juvenile criminal case records constitute permanent records under Chapter 58
of the Family Code (RQ-0576-KP)

Dear Ms. Meraz:

You ask whether certain juvenile records are “permanent records” that can only be
destroyed by court order. 1 For context, you explain that the Texas State Library and Archives
Commission (“TSLAC”) has adopted local government records retention schedules—pursuant to
its authority under section 441.158 of the Government Code—permitting “juvenile case papers
maintained by county and district clerks” to be destroyed under the parameters outlined in section
58.264 of the Family Code. Request Letter at 1–3. You note, however, that the Office of Court
Administration’s District Clerk Manual differs from TSLAC’s records retention schedules by
“suggest[ing] that juvenile records are permanent records unless a court orders destruction.” Id. at
5. You thus seek “an opinion regarding the retention period for juvenile case papers.” Id. at 6.

The Government Code and the Local Government Records Act assign complimentary
roles for local governments and TSLAC regarding local government records.

We begin by reviewing the statutory and regulatory frameworks relevant to your inquiry.
Chapter 441 of the Government Code addresses TSLAC’s authority over the preservation and
management of local government records. See generally TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 441.151–.169. For
purposes of subchapter J, a “local government” includes “a county” as well as “all district and
precinct offices of a county.” Id. § 441.151(7). A “local government record” is broadly defined to
include a wide array of materials, “regardless of physical form or characteristic,” that have been
“created or received by a local government or any of its officers or employees pursuant to law[] . . .
or in the transaction of public business.” Id. § 441.151(8). A retention period “means the minimum

1
Letter from Ms. Gloria Meraz, Dir. & Libr., Tex. State Libr. & Archives Comm’n, to Hon. Ken Paxton,
Tex. Att’y Gen. at 1 (Jan. 17, 2025), https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/request-files/request/
2025/RQ0576KP.pdf (“Request Letter”).
Ms. Gloria Meraz - Page 2

time that must pass after the creation, recording, or receipt of a record, or the fulfillment of certain
actions associated with a record, before it is eligible for destruction.” Id. § 441.151(13). And a
permanent record is “any local government record whose retention period on a records retention
schedule issued by [TSLAC] is given as permanent.” Id. § 441.151(9).

Subchapter J imposes various duties on both TSLAC’s director and librarian as well as
affected local governments. See generally id. §§ 441.152 (“Duties and Responsibilities of the
Director and Librarian”), .169 (“Duties of Local Governments”). These duties overlap with those
set forth in the Local Government Records Act: The director and librarian, for example, must
“carry out the duties and responsibilities of [TSLAC] relating to the management and preservation
of local government records imposed by [subchapter J] and [the Local Government Records Act].”
Id. § 441.152(1); see also TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE § 203.024 (requiring the director and librarian
to assist local governments in carrying out the Local Government Records Act’s requirements).
Under subchapter J, each local government must “file with the director and librarian a written
certification as provided by Section 203.041, Local Government Code, that the local government
has prepared a records control schedule that[] . . . complies with a local government records
retention schedule distributed by the director and librarian under Section 441.158.” TEX. GOV’T
CODE § 441.169(4)(B); see also TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE § 203.041(d) (requiring a local
government’s records management officer to “file with the director and librarian a written
certification of compliance that the local government . . . has amended the records control
schedules to comply with the minimum requirements established on records retention schedules
issued by the commission”). A local government’s “records control schedule” lists the records it
maintains, the corresponding retention periods, 2 and “other records disposition information.” TEX.
LOC. GOV’T CODE § 201.003(12).

The Local Government Records Act also authorizes the destruction of local government
records under certain circumstances, including if “the record is listed on a valid records control
schedule and . . . its retention period has expired.” Id. § 202.001(a)(1). That authority is
complimented by section 441.158 of the Government Code, which in relevant part sets forth the
director and librarian’s duties as follows:

(a) The director and librarian, under the direction of [TSLAC], shall
prepare and distribute free of charge to records management officers
of affected local governments the records retention schedules for
each type of local government, including a schedule for records
common to all types of local government. The commission shall
adopt the schedules by rule.

(b) Each records retention schedule must:

2
A “retention period” for purposes of the Local Government Records Act “means the minimum time that
must pass after the creation, recording, or receipt of a record, or the fulfillment of certain actions associated with a
record, before it is eligible for destruction.” TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE § 201.003(16).
Ms. Gloria Meraz - Page 3

(1) list the various types of records of the applicable local
government;

(2) state the retention period prescribed by a federal or state
law, rule of court, or regulation for records for which a
period is prescribed; and

(3) prescribe retention periods for all other records, which
periods have the same effect as if prescribed by law after the
records retention schedule is adopted as a rule of the
commission.

TEX. GOV’T CODE § 441.158(a)–(b). As TSLAC’s regulations make clear, these records retention
schedules generally “apply to records and record data of all local government offices maintaining
records of the types named in each records retention schedule, regardless of the media in which
the records or record data are maintained.” 13 TEX. ADMIN. CODE § 7.122. The schedules establish
only the “minimum requirements and shall in no way affect the authority of the governing bodies
of local governments or of elected county officials to establish longer periods of time for which
records of their government or office are to be retained.” Id. § 7.123(b); see also TEX. LOC. GOV’T
CODE § 203.041(d) (requiring compliance with “the minimum requirements established on records
retention schedules”). At bottom, these provisions form a carefully crafted, harmonious framework
under which TSLAC and local governments perform complimentary roles.

The Juvenile Justice Code authorizes specific individuals and entities to destroy
certain categories of juvenile records.

The Juvenile Justice Code also proves relevant to your inquiry. See generally TEX. FAM.
CODE §§ 51.01–61.107. Among other things, it provides that a county clerk or district clerk can
serve as a juvenile court clerk if the clerk’s court is designated as the juvenile court. Id. § 51.04(b)
(listing district courts and county courts as among the local governmental entities that a juvenile
board may designate as a juvenile court); see also TEX. CONST. art. V, §§ 9 (mandating a clerk of
the district court), 20 (mandating a county clerk “who shall be clerk of the County and
Commissioners Courts”). Chapter 58 of the Family Code, in particular, pertains to records
associated with a juvenile justice information system. See generally TEX. FAM. CODE §§ 58.001–
.405. This chapter assigns particular duties to juvenile court clerks, including the retention of
documents described in section 58.108. See id. § 58.108(b). Additionally, juvenile court clerks are
among those who possess the highest level of access to information within the local juvenile justice
information system. Id. § 58.306.

Chapter 58, subchapter C-1 specifically pertains to sealing and destruction of records in a
juvenile matter. See generally id. §§ 58.251–.265. A juvenile matter is “a referral to a juvenile
court or juvenile probation department and all related court proceedings and outcomes,” while a
record is “any documentation related to a juvenile matter, including information contained in that
documentation.” Id. § 58.251(2), (4). The subchapter distinguishes between electronic and
physical records. Id. § 58.251(1), (3) (defining both). Though most of the subchapter addresses the
sealing of juvenile records, sections 58.263 and 58.264 pertain to destruction. Id. §§ 58.263
Ms. Gloria Meraz - Page 4

(discussing court-ordered destruction), .264 (discussing other, permitted destruction); see also id.
§ 58.259(b) (“Physical or electronic records are considered sealed if the records are not destroyed
but are stored in a manner that allows access to the records only by the custodian of records for
the entity possessing the records.”).

The call of your request implicates section 58.264. See generally Request Letter at 1.
Subsection (a) identifies who may authorize the destruction of records possessed by specifically
named entities, and (b) ties destruction authority to an individual’s current age and the severity of
the conduct involved:

(a) Subject to Subsections (b) and (c) of this section, Section
202.001, 3 Local Government Code, and any other restrictions
imposed by an entity’s records retention guidelines, the following
persons may authorize the destruction of records in a closed juvenile
matter, regardless of the date the records were created:

(1) a juvenile board, in relation to the records in the
possession of the juvenile probation department;

(2) the head of a law enforcement agency, in relation to the
records in the possession of the agency; and

(3) a prosecuting attorney, in relation to the records in the
possession of the prosecuting attorney’s office.

(b) The records related to a person referred to a juvenile probation
department may be destroyed if the person:

(1) is at least 18 years of age, and:

(A) the most serious conduct for which the person
was referred was conduct indicating a need for
supervision, whether or not the person was
adjudicated; or

(B) the referral or information did not relate to
conduct indicating a need for supervision or
delinquent conduct and the juvenile probation
department, prosecutor, or juvenile court did not take
action on the referral or information for that reason;

3
This reference to section 202.001 of the Local Government Code demonstrates that records in a closed
juvenile matter also fall under the relatively broad definition of a “local government record” for purposes of the Local
Government Records Act. See TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE § 201.003(8). Further, that meaning is substantially similar to
the definition of “local government record” applicable to Chapter 441, subchapter J of the Government Code. See
TEX. GOV’T CODE § 441.151(8).
Ms. Gloria Meraz - Page 5

(2) is at least 21 years of age, and:

(A) the most serious conduct for which the person
was adjudicated was delinquent conduct that violated
a penal law of the grade of misdemeanor; or

(B) the most serious conduct for which the person
was referred was delinquent conduct and the person
was not adjudicated as having engaged in the
conduct; or

(3) is at least 31 years of age and the most serious conduct
for which the person was adjudicated was delinquent
conduct that violated a penal law of the grade of felony.

TEX. FAM. CODE § 58.264(a)–(b) (footnote added). Subsection 58.264(c) addresses the destruction
of records containing information related to multiple persons. Id. § 58.264(c). Destruction of
electronic records occurs when “the electronic records, including the index to the records, are
deleted.” Id. § 58.264(d). Physical records converted to an electronic record, however, are not
considered destroyed so long as the electronic record is maintained. Id. § 58.264(e). Section 58.264
“does not authorize the destruction of the records of the juvenile court or clerk of court.” Id.
§ 58.264(f). Nor does the provision “affect the destruction of physical records and files authorized
by the Texas State Library Records Retention Schedule.” Id. § 58.264(h).

A county clerk or district clerk may destroy juvenile case papers pursuant to a local
government’s records control schedule that complies with TSLAC’s records retention
schedule.

Your question ultimately requires us to address the interplay between the Government
Code, the Local Government Records Act, and the Juvenile Justice Code—with regard to the
“retention period for juvenile case papers” that are “maintained by county and district clerks.” See
Request Letter at 3, 6. TSLAC adopted twelve records retention schedules pursuant to its authority
under section 441.158 of the Government Code. 13 TEX. ADMIN. CODE § 7.125(a); see also id.
§ 7.121(2) (defining “records retention schedule”). Relevant here, TSLAC established Local
Schedule CC, which pertains to county clerk records, as well as Local Schedule DC, which pertains
to district clerk records. Id. § 7.125(a)(3)–(4). Each schedule addresses “juvenile case papers,”
with the relevant record numbers listed as CC1700-10 for county clerk records and DC2100-10
for district clerk records. 4 Id. Under these schedules, juvenile case papers are not “permanent
records” because their retention period is not listed as permanent. Id.; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE
§ 441.151(9). Instead, the “total retention” column in the schedules’ tables contains age- and
offense-related parameters that mirror those in Family Code subsection 58.264(b). Compare TEX.
FAM. CODE § 58.264(b), with 13 TEX. ADMIN. CODE § 7.125(a)(3)–(4). It follows that juvenile case

4
The schedules describe “juvenile case papers” as “[d]ocuments relating to juvenile detention, transfer,
adjudication, or disposition, including all records transferred to the court by law enforcement or other agencies under
sealing orders issued by a court.” 13 TEX. ADMIN. CODE § 7.125(a)(3)–(4).
Ms. Gloria Meraz - Page 6

papers may be destroyed, without a court order, so long as TSLAC can include these parameters
in its record retention schedules as a “retention period.” See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 441.151(13); see
also id. § 441.158(b)(2).

Retention periods may be included in records retention schedules under one of two
rationales. See id. § 441.158(b). First, regarding “records for which a period is prescribed,” the
schedule must state that legally prescribed retention period. Id. § 441.158(b)(2). Second, “for all
other records” for which no retention period is elsewhere established, TSLAC must itself
“prescribe retention periods” in the schedule. Id. § 441.158(b)(3). Here, each relevant record
number specifically cites Family Code subsections 58.264(b)(1) through (3) and features the
notation “by law.” 13 TEX. ADMIN. CODE § 7.125(a)(3)–(4). We thus begin by considering whether
TSLAC’s authority under Government Code subsection 441.158(b)(2) requires the inclusion of
Family Code section 58.264 in the records retention schedules for county and district clerks. 5

The term “retention period” often “means the minimum time that must pass after the
creation, recording, or receipt of a record.” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 441.151(13); TEX. LOC. GOV’T
CODE § 201.003(16). Under that definition, section 58.264 would not qualify as a retention period
because it expressly allows for records destruction “regardless of the date the records were
created.” TEX. FAM. CODE § 58.264(a). However, both Chapter 441 of the Government Code and
the Local Government Records Act provide an alternative definition—“the fulfillment of certain
actions associated with a record, before it is eligible for destruction.” TEX. GOV’T CODE
§ 441.151(13); TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE § 201.003(16). Section 58.264 specifically sets forth the
actions required for juvenile records destruction to be authorized. First, the person whose records
are to be destroyed must have reached the applicable threshold of eighteen, twenty-one, or thirty-
one years of age. TEX. FAM. CODE § 58.264(b). Second, for records in the possession of entities
named in subsection (a), the relevant individual must authorize destruction. Id. § 58.264(a). Given
these requirements, section 58.264 constitutes a “retention period” for the purposes of the
Government Code and the Local Government Records Act.

But this does not end our inquiry. We must also consider whether the records destruction
authority applies to Local Schedule CC and Local Schedule DC. Section 58.264 extends only to
“records in the possession of” three named entities. Id. We presume that your question regarding
“juvenile case papers maintained by county and district clerks” means records in the possession of
such clerks. See Request Letter at 3 (emphasis added). We thus address whether district clerks and
county clerks are included in the three named categories of juvenile probation departments, law
enforcement agencies, or prosecuting attorney’s offices. See TEX. FAM. CODE § 58.264(b).

They are not. A juvenile board is authorized by statute to establish a juvenile probation
department, TEX. HUM. RES. CODE § 152.0007(a)(1), and may employ personnel with advice and
consent of the commissioners court, id. § 142.002(a). See generally id. §§ 142.001–.007 (“Juvenile
Probation Departments and Personnel”). But county clerks and district clerks are not departmental

5
Though you reference Opinion GA-1017 in your request, Request Letter at 5–6, it is of little bearing on
the present question. That opinion dealt with a perceived conflict in the predecessor to section 58.264, which
contained different language and did not involve TSLAC’s authority to prepare and distribute records retention
schedules. Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. GA-1017 (2013) at 3–4. We therefore decline further discussion.
Ms. Gloria Meraz - Page 7

employees; they are constitutionally established officers. See McLennan Cnty. v. Boggess, 137
S.W. 346, 347 (Tex. 1911) (“The Constitution of this state provides for the offices of . . . county
and district clerks[] and prescribes the duty and authority of such officers.”). Accordingly, neither
is appropriately considered a part of a juvenile probation department.

Nor are such clerks part of a “law enforcement agency.” Although the Juvenile Justice
Code does not define that phrase, it does define “law enforcement officer” by incorporating Article
2A.001 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. FAM. CODE § 51.02(7). Yet that article
exhaustively lists thirty-three categories of peace officers—none of which include county or
district clerks. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 2A.001. Further, the Code of Criminal Procedure
generally treats peace officers and law enforcement agencies in tandem and places duties on peace
officers that materially differ from those performed by clerks. Compare id. arts. 2a.051–2a.066
(“Powers and Duties of Peace Officers and Law Enforcement Agencies”), and id. art. 2A.051
(“General Powers and Duties of Peace Officers”), with id. art. 2.21 (“Duty of Clerks”). This proves
consistent with definitions of “law enforcement agency” found elsewhere in the Code of Criminal
Procedure, which reveals that law enforcement agencies traditionally employ peace officers. See,
e.g., id. arts. 2B.0201(2), 59.01(5).

Finally, for the purposes of section 58.264, county and district clerks are not members of
the prosecuting attorney’s office. A prosecuting attorney is “the county attorney, district attorney,
or other attorney who regularly serves in a prosecutory capacity in a juvenile court.” TEX. FAM.
CODE § 51.02(11). The offices of county attorney and district attorney are constitutionally distinct
from those of county clerk and district clerk. Compare TEX. CONST. art. V, § 21 (county and district
attorneys), with id. art. V, §§ 9 (district clerks), 20 (county clerks). Further, county and district
clerks do not regularly serve in a prosecutory capacity. See, e.g., TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 51.303
(establishing the duties and powers of district clerks), .402 (same for county clerks). Because
subsection 58.264(a) does not encompass county or district clerks, Government Code subsection
441.158(b)(2) does not authorize inclusion in Local Schedule CC or DC. 6 See id. § 441.158(b)(2).

You nonetheless highlight that “the remarks field” in Local Schedule CC and DC cites to
Family Code subsections 58.264(b)(1), (2), and (3)—as “context for [the] retention period.”
Request Letter at 3–4. By this, we presume that you mean to rely upon TSLAC’s authority to
“prescribe retention periods for all other records” under subsection 441.158(b)(3). 7 See TEX.
GOV’T CODE § 441.158(b)(3). But neither section 58.264 nor any other “federal or state law, rule
of court, or regulation” of which we are aware prescribes a retention period for juvenile case papers
maintained by county or district clerks. See id. § 441.158(b)(2). These papers thus constitute “other
records” for which TSLAC must itself “prescribe retention periods,” id. § 441.158(b)(3), and
TSLAC may determine that this retention period should align with the criteria set forth for other
local government actors under Family Code section 58.264.

6
Because clerks are not members of the three entities named in subsection 58.264(a), we need not address
the meaning of subsection 58.264(f)’s statement that section 58.264 “does not authorize the destruction of the records
of the . . . clerk of court.” TEX. FAM. CODE § 58.264(f).
The parameters set forth in section 58.264, of course, constitute a “retention period” under Chapter 441 of
7

the Government Code and the Local Government Records Act. See supra pp. 3–6.
Ms. Gloria Meraz - Page 8

It merits note that the retention periods prescribed by TSLAC “have the same effect as if
prescribed by law after the records retention schedule is adopted as a rule of the commission.” Id.
Once adopted, county and district clerks must certify in writing that their office “has amended the
records control schedules to comply with the minimum requirements established on records
retention schedules.” TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE § 203.041(d). County and district clerks may, of
course, “establish longer periods of time for which records of their government or office are to be
retained,” 13 TEX. ADMIN. CODE § 7.123(b)—after which they may destroy such records, TEX.
LOC. GOV’T CODE § 202.001(a)(1). We therefore conclude that a county clerk’s office may destroy
juvenile case papers it maintains pursuant to a records control schedule that complies with Local
Schedule CC, and a district clerk’s office may destroy juvenile case papers it maintains pursuant
to a records control schedule that complies with Local Schedule DC.
Ms. Gloria Meraz - Page 9

S U M M A R Y

The Government Code and the Local Government Records
Act assign complimentary roles for local governments and TSLAC
regarding local government records. The Juvenile Justice Code
authorizes specific individuals and entities to destroy certain
categories of juvenile records, and a county clerk or district clerk
may destroy juvenile case papers pursuant to a local government’s
records control schedule that complies with TSLAC’s records
retention schedule.

Very truly yours,

KEN PAXTON
Attorney General of Texas

BRENT WEBSTER
First Assistant Attorney General

LESLEY FRENCH
Chief of Staff

D. FORREST BRUMBAUGH
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

JOSHUA C. FIVESON
Chair, Opinion Committee

J. AARON BARNES
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee