2024 Tex. Bus. 7•Seter v. Westdale Asset Management, 2024 Tex. Bus. 7 (1st Div.) (mem. op.)
Seter v. Westdale Asset Management, 2024 Tex. Bus. 7 (1st Div.) (mem. op.)
2024 Tex. Bus. 7Texbizct
Full text
2024 Tex. Bus. 7 The Business Court of Texas, First Division Christopher Seter, Plaintiff, v. Westdale Asset Management, Ltd., JGB Ventures I, Ltd., Joseph Beard, and Westdale Investments, L.P., Defendants. § § § § § § § § Cause No. 24-BC01A-0006 ═══════════════════════════════════════ Memorandum Opinion and Order to Remand ═══════════════════════════════════════ 1 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, challenging removal on grounds that the action was commenced before September 1, 2024, and because the amount in controversy does not fall within this Court’s jurisdiction. 2 The legislation creating the Business Court specifically states that the Court “is created September 1, 2024” and that “changes in law made by this Act apply to civil actions commenced on or after September 1, 2024.” Act of May 25, 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., ch. 380 (H.B. 19 §§5, 8); 2023 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 919, 929 (H.B. 19). In six prior instances, this Court has remanded actions commenced before September 1, 2024, for lack of authority or want of jurisdiction. See, e.g., Energy Transfer LP, et al. v. Culberson Midstream LLC, et al., 2024 Tex. Bus. 1 (Tex. Bus. Ct. October 30, E-filed in the Office of the Clerk for the Business Court of Texas 12/16/2024 12:02 PM Accepted by: Beverly Crumley Case Number: 24-BC01A-0006
2024) (holding “this court does not have authority over cases filed before September 1, 2024”); Jorrie v. Charles, et al., Tex. Bus. 4 (Tex. Bus. Ct. November 7, 2024) (holding “[b]ecause this suit commenced before that date, the court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate it.”); Winans v. Berry, Tex. Bus. 5 (Tex. Bus. Ct. November 7, 2024) (holding “because this case commenced prior to September 1, 2024, Chapter 25A and its removal procedure do not apply to it . . .”). The Court is unpersuaded by Defendants’ arguments that these cases were wrongly decided. 3 It is undisputed that the instant action commenced before September 1, 2024. Without reaching Plaintiff’s second argument, the Court holds that removal is improper and grants the motion to remand. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the case is remanded to County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas. ANDREA K. BOURESSA Judge of the Texas Business Court, First Division SIGNED ON: December 16, 2024.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.