Wonisha Tatum v. The Honorable Angela Lancelin — Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 20, 2026.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-26-00891-CV
WONISHA TATUM, Appellant
V.
THE HONORABLE ANGELA LANCELIN, Appellee
On Appeal from the 245th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2026-49000
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted interlocutory appeal from the “final administrative
orders, implied denials of recusals and disqualification, and related rulings entered
on or about July 23, 2026”. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final
judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When,
as here, orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain
interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is rendered unless a statutory
exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex.

2
2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig.
proceeding).
On September 11, 2026, notification was transmitted to the parties of this
court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant
filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App.
P. 42.3(a). Appellant did not file a response.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Hart, and Bridges.