State v. Williams

CourtListener 6807325SdAug 10, 1938

Full text

PER CURIAM.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of receiving stolen property. The principal errors assigned deal with the sufficiency of the evidence. Judgment was entered on July 19, 19317. The motion for a new trial was not made until September 27, I937- The trial court was without jurisdiction to hear the motion, and no question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict can b.e considered upon appeal. State v. Mound, 65 S. D. 611, 277 N. W. 35; State v. Bowder, 65 S. D. 626, 277 N. W. 43; State v. Bowder, 66 S. D. 43, 278 N. W. 27.

Errors assigned upon the appeal from the judgment have been considered and found to' be without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.