CourtListener 6800278•Pillar v. Runkel, Rowley & Co.
Full text
Fuller, J.
As the record now before us presents questions of law and fact identical with.the case of Chaffee v. This Defendant, 11 S. D. 333, 77 N. W. 583, an opinion would be but a needless repetition. Controlled by the conclusion there reached, the order overruling a motion to discharge the attachment is affirmed. 1
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.