Pillar v. Runkel, Rowley & Co.

CourtListener 6800278SdDec 17, 1898

Full text

Fuller, J.
As the record now before us presents questions of law and fact identical with.the case of Chaffee v. This Defendant, 11 S. D. 333, 77 N. W. 583, an opinion would be but a needless repetition. Controlled by the conclusion there reached, the order overruling a motion to discharge the attachment is affirmed. 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.