Miller v. Armstrong

CourtListener 6799731SdOct 17, 1896

Full text

Haney, J.
Herein plaintiffs appeal from an order discharging an attachment. The debt sued upon was not due when the attachment issued. The court erred in excluding all evidence in support of the allegation that the debt was incurred for property obtained under false pretenses. Finch v. Armstrong, 9 S D. 255, 68 N. W. 740. The order appealed from is reversed.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.