CourtListener 7469393•Chiles v. Holloway
Full text
Waties, J.
who heard the case dismissed the rule.— He thought the sheriff had no authority to receive the-money but what he derived from the execution, and that a payment made to the deputy before the sheriff himself' was authorised to receive it,, could not-render the sheriff Hable. The party paying must look to the deputy.
The Court of Appeals confirmed his honor’s judgment.
Rule dismissedl.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.