Edward Kirk, Jr. v. State

CourtListener 10648678ScctappAug 6, 2025

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Edward Kirk, Jr., Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2022-001823

Appeal From Richland County
D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-279
Submitted July 16, 2025 – Filed August 6, 2025

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for
Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General D. Russell Barlow, II,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: After considering Edward Kirk Jr.'s petition for a writ of
certiorari, this court granted certiorari on Kirk's request for a belated direct appeal
pursuant to White v. State, 263 S.C. 110, 208 S.E.2d 35 (1974), and we proceeded
with our review of the direct appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). After review, this appeal is dismissed. Counsel's motion to be relieved as
counsel for the direct appeal is granted. 1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

VINSON, TURNER, and CURTIS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.