CourtListener 10614338•SCDSS v. Morgan Thacker
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Morgan Thacker, Nathaniel Green, and John Doe,
Defendants,
Of whom Morgan Thacker is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2024-001826
Appeal From Greenville County
Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-201
Submitted May 27, 2025 – Filed June 20, 2025
AFFIRMED
Adam Gabriel Touma, of Greenville; and Harry A.
Hancock, of Columbia, both for Appellant.
Amanda Stiles, of South Carolina Department of Social
Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Megan Goodwin Burke, of Greenville, for the Guardian
ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Morgan Thacker appeals the family court's final order finding
she physically abused and physically neglected her minor child (Child) and
terminating her parental rights to Child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-1660(E)
(2010) (setting forth findings a family court must make when removing a child
from the custody of a parent); S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2024). Upon a
thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and
conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381
(1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the
family court's rulings and relieve Thacker's counsel.
AFFIRMED. 1
WILLIAMS, C.J., and GEATHERS and TURNER, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.