CourtListener 10291535•State v. Jonathan S. Ostrowski
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jonathan Stanley Ostrowski, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2024-000568
Appeal From York County
Daniel Dewitt Hall, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-417
Submitted December 4, 2024 – Filed December 11, 2024
APPEAL DISMISSED
William G. Yarborough, III and Lauren C. Hobbis, both
of William G. Yarborough III, Attorney at Law, LLC, of
Greenville, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds
Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1
THOMAS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.