State v. Ivington D. Allen

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Ivington Daniel Allen, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2022-000638

Appeal From Dorchester County
Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-400
Submitted November 21, 2024 – Filed November 27, 2024

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia; and
Ivington Daniel Allen, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

KONDUROS, GEATHERS and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.