State v. Larry

CourtListener 10156222ScctappMar 4, 2008

Full text

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Daniel Lamar
Larry, Appellant.

Appeal from Union County

 Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-143

Submitted March 3, 2008 – Filed March 4,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of
Columbia; Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Daniel Lamar Larry appeals
his convictions for assault with intent
to kill and trafficking in crack cocaine, as well as sentence of ten years for the assault charge and eighteen years for the trafficking
charge to be served consecutively.  Larry
contends the trial court erred in refusing to charge entrapment.  After a thorough review of the record
and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss Larry’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.