State v. Davis

CourtListener 10156197ScctappMar 12, 2008

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Thomas
Jefferson Davis, Appellant.

Appeal From Sumter County

 Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-159

Submitted March 3, 2008 – Filed March 12,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, South Carolina Commission of
Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Cecil Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Thomas
Jefferson Davis appeals his guilty plea to two counts of possession of crack
cocaine with intent to distribute, two counts of possession of crack cocaine
with intent to distribute within proximity of a school, nine counts of
receiving stolen goods, and one count each of possession of cocaine, failure to
stop for a blue light, and shoplifting.  On
appeal, Davis maintains the plea court, by advising him of his right to appeal,
rendered his plea conditional, and therefore, invalid under our jurisprudence.  After a thorough review of the record and
counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Davis’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.