CourtListener 10156119•State v. Phillips
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
David. T.
Phillips, Appellant.
Appeal From Lexington County
James R. Barber, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-440
Submitted August 1, 2008 Filed August 6,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.
PER
CURIAM: David T. Phillips appeals his guilty plea to receiving stolen goods in an amount between $1000 and $5000,
and sentence to three years imprisonment. He
maintains his guilty plea failed to conform with the mandates set forth in Boykin
v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). Phillips filed a separate pro se brief claiming his plea was not voluntarily made and he received ineffective
assistance of counsel. After a thorough
review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
KONDUROS, J.,
CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.