SCDSS v. Doe

CourtListener 10156102ScctappAug 8, 2008

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Gina M., Jeremy
W., and John Doe, Defendants,

Of Whom Gina M.
is the Appellant.

In the interest of S.M., a minor child under
the age of 18.

Appeal From Pickens County

Alvin D. Johnson, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-466

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August 8,
2008

AFFIRMED

Rodney W. Richey, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent.

Steven L. Alexander, of Pickens, for
Guardian Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Gina
M. appeals from the family court’s order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child, S.M.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 20-7-1572 (Supp. 2007).  Upon a thorough review
of the record and the family court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law,
pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we
find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family
court’s ruling and relieve counsel.

AFFIRMED.[1]

HEARN, C.J., CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.