State v. Childs

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jesse Lee
Childs, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

 Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-483

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August
12, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert Mills Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Jesse Lee Childs appeals his guilty plea to armed robbery, carjacking, possession of a weapon
during the commission of a violent crime, and breaking and entering a motor
vehicle and concurrent sentences of fifteen, fifteen, five, and five,
respectively.  Childs’ counsel argues the plea court erred by
accepting his plea to both armed robbery and carjacking in violation of his right against double jeopardy because both charges were based on the same set of
facts.  Childs filed a separate pro se brief claiming he received ineffective assistance of counsel.  After
a thorough review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 KONDUROS, J., CURETON and GOOLSBY,
A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.