State v. Harold Wilson

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Harold Jamar
Wilson, Appellant.

Appeal From Sumter County

Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-588

Submitted December 1, 2009 – Filed
December 14, 2009   

AFFIRMED

Acting Chief Appellate Attorney Robert M.
Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka all of Columbia;
and Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Harold Jamar Wilson was convicted of murder, assault
and battery with intent to kill (ABIK), attempted armed robbery, and possession
of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime.  The trial court
sentenced Wilson to life on the murder charge and imposed a consecutive
sentence of twenty years for ABIK, twenty years for armed robbery to run
consecutive to the murder charge and concurrent to the ABIK charge, and five years
on the firearm possession charge to run consecutive to the other three charges.  Wilson appeals, contending the trial
court erred in allowing his juvenile record to be published to the jury without
first receiving an order from the family court judge to obtain the record.  

We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR and the following authorities:  S.C. Code Ann. § 20-7-8515(D)
(Supp. 2004) (“Law enforcement information or records of children created
pursuant to the provisions of this article may be shared among . . .
solicitors’ offices . . . for criminal justice purposes without a court
order.”) (emphasis added); S.C. Code Ann. § 20-7-8510(G) (Supp. 2004) (“The
department or the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, or both, must
provide to . . . a solicitor . . . upon request, a copy of a child offense
history for criminal justice purposes.  This information must not be
disseminated except as authorized in Section 20-7-8515.”);  S.C. Code Ann. §
20-7-8510(H) (“Other information retained by the department may be provided to .
. . a solicitor . . . pursuant to an ongoing criminal investigation or
prosecution.”); and Rule 609(d), SCRE, (“Evidence of a juvenile adjudication is
admissible under this rule if conviction of the crime would be admissible to
attack the credibility of an adult.”).[1]

AFFIRMED.

HUFF and
GEATHERS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.