State v. Boyce

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

William T.
Boyce, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-611

Submitted December 1, 2009 – Filed
December 22, 2009  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: William T. Boyce appeals the revocation of his probation.  Boyce argues
the circuit court erred as a matter of law, abused its discretion, and violated
his right to due process of law by revoking his probation when he was not
arrested for his probation violations until over two years after the probation
arrest warrants were issued.  After a
thorough review of the record, counsel's brief, and Boyce's pro se brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Boyce's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.