State v. Shine

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Michael Shine, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-444

Submitted September 1,2009 – Filed October
2, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J.
Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Michael Shine appeals his convictions for murder, kidnapping, first-degree
burglary, and robbery, arguing the trial
judge erred in failing to instruct the jury on the law of accessory after the
fact.  Shine also filed a pro
se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and briefs pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

Short, Williams,
and Geathers, J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.