State v. Wells

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Freddie Wells, Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-456

Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October
8, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Freddie
Wells appeals the revocation of his probation.  Specifically, Wells contends the
circuit court erred in revoking community supervision because the Department of
Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services presented inadequate evidence at the
probation revocation hearing. After a
thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

Hearn, C.J., Konduros, and Lockemy, JJ.,  concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.