State v. Casillo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Stephen Casillo, Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-465

Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October
12, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina T. Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Stephen
Casillo appeals his guilty pleas for four counts of armed robbery, attempted
armed robbery, assault with intent to kill, and possession of a bomb or hoax
device.  On appeal, his counsel argues his guilty plea did not comply with the
mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  Additionally,
Casillo filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough
review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

HUFF,
THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.          

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.