State v. Wright

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Bryan Wright, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-478

Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October
14, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin S. Brackett, of York, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Bryan Wright appeals his convictions and sentences
for: (1) distribution of crack cocaine, third offense, and (2) distribution of
crack cocaine within proximity of a park.  Wright argues the jury charge on
reasonable doubt was confusing and would allow a jury to find him guilty using a
lesser degree of proof.  After
a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief, and Wright's pro se brief, pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's
motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

Hearn, C.J., Konduros, and Lockemy, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.