CourtListener 10155897•State v. Ronald Wood
Full text
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Ronald Wood, Appellant.
Appeal From Lexington County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-492
Submitted October 1, 2009 Filed October
21, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of
Lexington, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Ronald
Wood pled guilty to first-degree burglary and was sentenced to fifteen years'
incarceration. Wood asserts the trial court erred by accepting his plea
because it did not comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama,
395 U.S. 238 (1969). Wood filed a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and both
briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
SHORT, WILLIAMS, and
GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.