CourtListener 10155895•State v. Smoak
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Edward Lamar
Smoak, Jr., Appellant.
Appeal From Lexington County
R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-488
Submitted October 1, 2009 Filed October
21, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Edward
Lamar Smoak, Jr., pled guilty to armed
robbery pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970). Smoak
appeals, arguing the plea judge erred in accepting his guilty plea before
determining Smoak's competence at the time of the offense. Smoak filed a
separate pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and both briefs pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Smoak's appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
SHORT,
WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.