In The Matter Of The Care And Treatment Of Jackie Dodson

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In The Matter
Of The Care And Treatment Of Jackie Dodson, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-418

Submitted September 1, 2009 – Filed
September 3, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, all
of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Jackie Dodson appeals from the order of
the circuit court committing him to long term care, control, and treatment as a
sexually violent predator.  He argues the trial judge erred in allowing the
State's witness to testify regarding detailed information Dodson related during
the course of an evaluation.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel's
brief, and Dodson's pro se brief, 
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.