State v. Peel

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Norman E. Peel, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

James W. Johnson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-429

Submitted September 1, 2009 – Filed
September 8, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel
Tommy Evans, Jr., and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Normal E. Peel appeals the revocation of his probation,
arguing the trial court erred in revoking his probation without finding his
failure to pay for a substance abuse program was willful.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

HEARN, C.J., and
KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.