State v. Williams

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Brenton Ray Williams, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-432

Submitted September 1, 2009 – Filed
September 9, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel John B. Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Brenton
Ray Williams appeals the revocation of
his probation. Williams argues the circuit court's decision to revoke his
probation was arbitrary, capricious, and without evidentiary support, amounting
to a denial of due process.  After a
thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS,
and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.