CourtListener 10155856•State v. Meggett
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Darian Antway Meggett, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-438
Submitted September 1, 2009 Filed
September 10, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender for Capital Appeals Robert M.
Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett A. Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Darian Antway Meggett appeals his guilty
plea to criminal domestic violence, third offense, and three-year sentence.
Meggett's counsel argues his plea did not conform to the mandates set forth in Boykin
v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). Meggett filed a separate pro se brief. After
consideration of both briefs, and review pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. [1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J.,
and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.