State v. McCall

CourtListener 10155813ScctappJun 2, 2009

Full text

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.,

Thomas McCall
Jr., Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

 Michael Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-273

Submitted May 1, 2009 – Filed June 2, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Thomas
McCall, Jr., appeals his guilty pleas  and sentences for possession of cocaine
base, assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature, and first-degree
criminal sexual conduct, arguing the plea court failed to advise him of the
constitutional rights he would be waiving by pleading guilty.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.