State v. Singletary

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tyrone Prince
Singletary, Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

 Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-357

Submitted June 1, 2009 – Filed June 23,
2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott; all of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar L. Clements, III, of Florence,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Tyrone Prince Singletary appeals his guilty plea to
nonviolent second-degree burglary, malicious injury to real property greater
than $5,000, and malicious injury to personal property greater than $5,000. 
Singletary argues the trial court erred by accepting his plea because it did
not comply with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.