State v. Bolte

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Mark Bolte, Appellant.

Appeal From Abbeville County

 Wyatt T. Saunders, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-361

Submitted June 1, 2009 – Filed June 24,
2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia; and Mark
Bolte, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Jerry W. Peace, of Greenwood, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Mark Bolte appeals his convictions and
sentences for incest, lewd act on a minor, and second degree criminal sexual
conduct with a minor.  Bolte argues the trial court erred by admitting evidence
outside the scope of allowable evidence
pursuant to State v. Shumpert, 312 S.C. 502, 435 S.E.2d 859 (1993). 
Bolte also filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., and THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.