State v. Mote

CourtListener 10155726ScctappJun 24, 2009

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jessica Mote, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

 Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-363

Submitted June 1, 2009 – Filed June 24,
2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia, and Solicitor Robert Mills Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Jessica
Mote appeals her guilty plea and sentence, arguing the trial court erred by
refusing to sentence her to the mandatory minimum sentence.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Mote's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.   

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., and THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.