State v. Chambers

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Altonio Marquez
Chambers, Appellant.

Appeal from York County

  Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-186

Submitted April 1, 2009 – Filed May 4,
2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services J. Benjamin Aplin, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Altonio Marquez Chambers appeals his probation revocation, arguing the trial
court erred in revoking his probation in full when he has no prior probation
violations.  After a thorough review of
the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT,
THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.