State v. McCants

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Quincy McCants, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 2009-UP-194

Submitted April 1, 2009 – Filed May 6,
2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Quincy
McCants appeals his conviction for armed robbery and twenty-two year sentence. 
McCants's counsel argues the trial court erred in failing to suppress
fingerprint evidence because the items from which the fingerprints were
obtained were not preserved as evidence for review.  McCants filed a pro se
brief arguing the trial court erred in admitting the victim's in-court
identification.  After a thorough
review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

SHORT,
THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.