CourtListener 10155690•Charleston County Department of Social Services v. T.W.
Charleston County Department of Social Services v. T.W.
CourtListener 10155690ScctappMay 15, 2009
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Charleston
County Department of Social Services, Respondent,
v.
T.W., J.J., and
K.W., Defendants,
of whom T.W. is Appellant.
In
the interest of two minor children under the age of 18 years.
Appeal from Charleston County
Judy L. McMahon, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-200
Submitted May 1, 2009 Filed May 15, 2009
AFFIRMED
Gregory A DeLuca, of Goose Creek, for Appellant.
Frampton Durban, Jr., of North Charleston, for Respondent.
Amanda B. Keaveny, of Charleston, for Guardian Ad Litem.
PER
CURIAM: T.W. (Mother). appeals from the family court's order requiring entry
of her name into the Central Registry of Child Abuse and Neglect, enjoining her
children's custodial grandparents from allowing any contact with Mother, and authorizing
DSS to forego reasonable efforts to reunite Mother's family. See S.C. Code Ann. §§ 63-7-1640, 63-7-1940(C) (2008).
After a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen,
291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), and S.C.
Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Frederick Downer, Sr., S.C. Sup. Ct. Order dated
February 2, 2005 (expanding the procedure set forth in Cauthen to
situations where an indigent person appeals from an order imposing measures, other
than the termination of parental rights, which are based upon child abuse and
neglect), the family court's
order is
AFFIRMED.[1]
HEARN, C.J., CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J.,
concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.