State v. Wroten

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Reginald Andre Wroten, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-253

Submitted May 1, 2009 – Filed May 28, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Reginald
Andre Wroten appeals from his guilty plea
to grand larceny between $1,000 and $5,000, breaking into a motor vehicle,
shoplifting third offense, and criminal domestic violence second offense.  ,
unlawful use of a telephone, and resisting arrest.  On appeal, Wroten argues
his plea did not comply with the mandates of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S
238 (1969).  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief, pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.